June 21, 2003

Piece of junk!

The whole column was a piece of junk, but these passages stood out to me not for the audacity of their claims, but the author’s arrogance in asking his readers to accept the claims without providing a shred of evidence to back them up. I would have given it a little more thought if he could actually come up with reasons show why it isn’t in American interests to let India and Pakistan negotiate bilaterally. Obviously, America wants a counterweight to China, but only a stable and prospering India can do that. Just to counter China, does this guy really think America wants to “colonize” the billions-of-people-filled India? Is he nuts?

The author keeps coming up with nightmare scenarios of America’s colonizing Russia(?), Pakistan(?) and all kinds of crazy ideas, without checking the plausibility of such things happening or even if it would be in American interest to do so. He breathlessly says it is the born-again Christian leading them all american barbarians to conquer the world! Oh, the sky is falling! They got rid of a tyrant in the cradle of civilization! (I guess tohim, it was a bad thing (?)).

I put so many question marks above, because he mentions the good things America did and spins out nightmare scenarios - I really don’t understand his thought processes. Did he ever consider the possibility that America elects a new leader every four years and the people can easily replace George Bush if they so choose to in a year? My God! talk about fomenting hysteria - of course, if you read the comments, you will find there are people who actually agree with this. I guess as long as you bash America and make ominous noises about Pax Americana and imperialism (I think he forgot hegemony), that is enough to warm the cockles of some hearts.

America’s great game
Today, the sad truth is America is inextricably involved in Kashmir, whether India likes it or not. America is merely waiting for the opportunity to pounce and hijack the entire Kashmir issue and resolve it under the auspices of the international community — another American euphemism for the USA and its satellite state, the UK. American interests lie not in a bilateral settlement (which is practically an impossibility) but in an American brokered peace, where American arms ensure freedom and peace in a nominally autonomous Kashmir.

Posted by shanti at June 21, 2003 7:42 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realwomenonline.com/scgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/2511

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Piece of junk!:


Comments

This character is from the same school of thought as Praful Bidwai. Is he a JNU-groupie?

We Indians have a whole slew of such outdated relics running around, who are masters of hyperbolic, illogical, conspiracy theories

Forget logic or common sense

Posted by: Prashant P Kothari at June 21, 2003 8:37 AM




True, Prashant - I am not arguing America is an angel or anything, but I respect people who actually bother to backup claims with facts and reasoning instead of throw around baseless allegations and hope one sticks.

Yiu are right in that he seems to be a compatriot of Bidwai and the likes of him.

Posted by: Shanti at June 21, 2003 9:18 AM




I am not arguing America is an angel or anything

Why not? It is mighty angelic of America to go through all this trouble just to free the world of tyrants. They have made the cruel Mullah Omar, OBL and Saddam go into hiding. That is the work of an angel.:beam:

Now only if we could locate the devil who armed/trained/empowered these people in the first place.:evil:

Posted by: Gaurav at June 22, 2003 12:42 AM




Byline at the end of the piece:Siddhu Warrier is a university student in Chennai

Damn. I wonder why rediff was not around when I was a University student! Hey Gaurav, u still are. Rediff does require a fresh batch of sensible writers. We should all volunteer to cleanse their Augean stables of the all the Bidwai.

Posted by: Yazad at June 23, 2003 4:30 AM




Btw, I hereby coin a new term

Bidwai: (n) piece of crap masquerading for public policy debate.

Posted by: Yazad at June 23, 2003 4:31 AM




Never bother with this one guys. A quick Google check revels that this kid is a sophomore or junior at most. I am sure he’ll be loved by the mainstream media shortly. I’ve lost my trust (whatever miniscule remains) in today’s media!

L.

Posted by: L. at June 23, 2003 6:24 AM




Yazad, it is true this column was a Bidwai ;)

L, but that is why we shopuld strive to point out the flaws in big media and lay them bare, so they know they cannot get away with the distribution of crap anymore.

Posted by: Shanti at June 23, 2003 6:30 AM




This Warrier guy ends his article with : “if the US could end Hitler’s Fortress Europe…one shudders to think what they could do today.” Yes, how awful. Stopping Hitler. What a terrible thing for the US to do.

Because you know, only devils who arm/train/empower people to do bad things are responsible for their actions….not the people themselves :smartass:

Posted by: Madhu at June 23, 2003 12:10 PM




Two birds at one shot, Madhu? ;)

I agree, the columnist seemed absolutely confused about what to make of things and kept listing the good stuff US did as if it were somehow bad :huh:

Posted by: Shanti at June 23, 2003 12:22 PM




Madhu,

Dunno if you read my blog, so copy pasting.

“Oceania is at war with Eastasia. Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia. Eurasia has always been our ally.”

“Oceania is at war with Eurasia. Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia. Eastasia has always been our ally.”

……from George Orwell’s 1984. Now if it became this -

America is at war with Russia. America has always been at war with Russia. Afghanistan/Iraq has always been our ally.

America is at war with Afghanistan/Iraq. America has always been at war with Afghanistan/Iraq. Russia has always been our ally.

Like the line from 1984 goes,

“He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future.”

Posted by: Gaurav at June 23, 2003 1:17 PM




And Madhu, no one said only people who arm/train/empower are responsible……but they can’t be absolved of their role in creating the mess either.

Posted by: Gaurav at June 23, 2003 1:19 PM




Gaurav

Yeah, I’ve read your blog. I like the way you write (although I think it’s fair to say we don’t exist on the same end of the ideological spectrum) :nice:

Posted by: Madhu at June 23, 2003 3:16 PM




Oh, and I don’t think anyone should be absolved…but I think it’s funny, for example, that the US gets the blame for turning Afghanistan into a mess while the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran is hardly mentioned at all.

Posted by: Madhu at June 23, 2003 3:19 PM




Well Madhu, atleast the US supported Saddam before he invaded Kuwait - what about IK Gujral “bhai-bhaing” with Saddam during the Gulf War? We actually have a statue of Stalin in Mumbai - I mean, he killed what - just a few million people!

Posted by: Shanti at June 23, 2003 3:59 PM




There are some issues in which India is not a player….or at least not in the focus of discussion. However some people manage to somehow get India into the picture and then lambast it. So far I thought only Prafool Bidwai, De-loopy D’souza and their ilk specialised in this.

Sad to see, there are non-leftists as well who indulge in the same “let’s-bash-india-to-rationalise-our-evils” ploy.

Posted by: Gaurav at June 24, 2003 8:36 AM




I have never been one of the “Blame America for everything” gang. The other countries you mentioned are equally at fault.

However I made that comment because I have seen that on this blog, you people mention faults, blunders and wrongs of all countries but America. If somehow the name of America does come in, related to universally accepted blunders, you follow the classical BalThackeray-ian approach of “Hey those other guys committed blunders too”…cleverly side stepping the issue that your country has done some pretty terrible things itself.

Posted by: Gaurav at June 24, 2003 8:43 AM




Nations do many things in their self-interest, at least in the short-term. The case of US arming OBL against the Soviets was such a case. They could’nt have predicted that OBL will turn hostile and hit back. India, too has armed forces in (the then) east-Pak during the refugee crisis. Now, we see a high anti-India activism there. Iguess we can make some progress if we analyze each situation objectively and try to learn from them.

L.

Posted by: at June 24, 2003 10:17 AM




You are completely wrong there, Gaurav - the only reason we are defending America is because everyone else is criticizing her - Everyone all over the world seems to be obsessed with criticizing America and there is no dearth of people talking trash about the US, whether justified or not. That is one of the main reasons why there is no discussion possible between the two groups. When the other group never misses a chance to slip in a snide remark whether it is in context or not (see your first comment above), how do you expect a rational discussion and for people to concede you have a point?

You are pushing people into an ideological corner when you come out attacking. There is no point asking us to criticize America, when you are doing enough of that without our help. As for dragging India into that, why not? You never criticize India, so we will do it for you. It isn’t that we loooove US or we hate India - it is just that when you are so quick to point out the warts of our adopted country, we have to show you your country and my country are not above blame either.

Posted by: Shanti at June 24, 2003 11:12 AM




Emm … a “light blogging” day for Shanti :confused:

L.

Posted by: L. at June 24, 2003 12:14 PM




I believe that’s the logical fallacy of ad hominem tu coque.

Posted by: MadMan at June 24, 2003 1:39 PM




Shanti, Gaurav, you are both guilty of the fallacy that Madhu’s posted above. It helps to look without preconceived notions. Defend what’s right, not because it’s being globally criticised. If the trash thrown on the US is justified, don’t blindly defend it. (Same goes for India / any other nation / group)

L, I think bin Laden is the classic case of a Frankenstein’s monster. Yes, it’s been done before many times (Bhindranwale in Punjab). But we know through bitter experience that the monster turns against the master. It’s happened time and again. With all this knowledge, to create more such monsters is either being naive or deluded.

Posted by: Yazad at June 25, 2003 1:31 AM




“As for dragging India into that, why not? You never criticize India, so we will do it for you.”

..hmm, you obviously never read my blog.

Posted by: Gaurav at June 25, 2003 1:42 AM




“the only reason we are defending America is because everyone else is criticizing her”

pardon me… but that is quite a lame reason for defending America!

Posted by: Sameer at June 25, 2003 7:25 AM




No it isn’t, Sameer - it is natural for people who like America in general to get defensive in an atmosphere like now, when people bash America for anything and everything.

Posted by: Shanti at June 25, 2003 8:57 AM




I think there is a difference between “America” and “the American govt” — most of the time the criticism is directed towards the faulty policies of the latter. I hold the ideals of America (life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness) in high regard, I hold the current and previous govts of the US in very low regard.

I think we need a little bit of clarity on what we’re fighting for here.

Posted by: Yazad at June 25, 2003 10:33 AM




I agree with you, Yaz - to understand my frustration, see what the initial post was about. That somehow completely degenerated into a discussion about defending America - I wasn’t doing that in my original post and I do concede initially that yeah, it isn’t like all American policies are that great.

Oh well, I am just going to leave it at that. I really didn’t want to make a big deal about this, but it is surely getting out of hand.

Posted by: Shanti at June 25, 2003 11:51 AM




This comes about a year late, but I think I met this guy at the Bournvita Quiz seven years ago. It’s amazing what google throws up.

Posted by: Aadisht at August 1, 2004 11:59 AM




That is very interesting, Aadisht!

Posted by: Shanti at August 1, 2004 12:54 PM




Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)
angry beam confused blush ;) :evil: :huh: :mad: :shocked: :smartass: :tongue3: :( :nice: