I guess there are people who think animal lives are worth a lot more than human lives. Don’t get me wrong - I would probably rush into a burning house to save my four dogs - but intimidating people and threatening violence because of research is waaay too loony for me.
New activism: Up close and personal“IT’S GOING exactly the way I said it would eight years ago,” says criminal justice professor Gary Perlstein, referring to a “Mother Jones” magazine interview that looked at how the more extreme activist groups might evolve. “They’re going to go more violent and eventually attack human beings,” Perlstein feels, in large part because of a decentralized structure that lets anyone join the cause without taking orders from above.Posted by shanti at July 1, 2003 5:05 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realwomenonline.com/scgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/2531
Deluded weirdos with screwed up priorities. I’d love to set some rabid dogs on them. Always wanted to do that to Maneka Gandhi. :mad:
Posted by: Gaurav at July 2, 2003 7:03 AM
LOL, Gaurav - I always think they should volunteer themselves for research in the place of the animals they want to save. Faster research times and we will know for sure if the medicines will work on humans or not before we put them out in the market.
Posted by: Shanti at July 2, 2003 9:02 AM
Shanti, are you sure if those tests will yield the same results on “Deluded weirdos” types and other normal beings :blush:
L.
Posted by: L. at July 2, 2003 12:09 PM
Good question, L - maybe they should be recognize as a separate species and displayed in zoos as such - I bet they would love that, co-existing with their fellow animals :evil::beam:
Posted by: Shanti at July 2, 2003 1:09 PM
long live vivisection
Posted by: uptotheminute at July 2, 2003 1:37 PM
The full force of the anti-terrorism laws should be applied to these people. Just because they are mostly white and from middle-class backgrounds shouldn’t give them a pass.
Posted by: David Foster at July 2, 2003 5:40 PM
I agree, David! The thing about most of them being white and middle-class, I call it the Rachel Corrie Syndrome.
Posted by: Shanti at July 2, 2003 8:29 PM
RACHEL CORRIE: A SAD “SOLIDARITY” STORY!!!
By Gary Fitleberg
According to the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) and falsely perpetuated by the vast majority of the media, allegedly “Rachel Corrie was murdered by Israel while she was peacefully protesting against the illegal demolition of a Palestinian home.”
American Rachel Corrie was killed in the Gaza Strip on March 16, 2003, when she entered an area where Israeli forces were carrying out a military operation. The incident tragically and unfortunately occurred while IDF forces were removing shrubbery along the security road near the border between Israel and Egypt at Rafah to uncover explosive devices, and destroying tunnels used by Palestinian terrorists to illegally smuggle weapons from Egypt to Gaza.
Corrie was not demonstrating for peace or trying to shield innocent civilians, she was interfering with a military operation to legally demolish an empty house used to conceal one of these tunnels.
A misleading photo published by the Associated Press gave the impression that Corrie was standing in front of the bulldozer and shouting at the driver with a megaphone, trying to prevent the driver from tearing down a building in the refugee camp. This photo, which was taken by a member of Corrie’s organization, was not shot at the time of her death, however, but hours earlier. The photographer said that Corrie was actually sitting and waving her arms when she was struck (Christian Science Monitor, April 02, 2003).
Israel’s Judge Advocate’s Office investigated the incident and concluded that the driver of the bulldozer never saw or heard Corrie because she was standing behind debris that obstructed the view of the driver whose field of view was limited by the small armored windows of his cab. An autopsy found that the cause of Corrie’s death was falling debris (Jerusalem Post, June 26, 2003).
The State Department warned Americans not to travel to Gaza, and Israel made clear that civilians who enter areas where troops are engaged in counter-terror operations put themselves unnecessarily at risk. This was not the first time protestors have tried to obstruct Israeli operations, and the IDF has made every effort to avoid harming them. This case received worldwide publicity in large measure because it was the first such incident where a protestor was killed. In fact, the army had told Corrie and other demonstrators from the anti-Israel International Solidarity Movement (ISM) to move out of the way. “It’s possible they [the protesters] were not as disciplined as we would have liked,” admitted Thom Saffold, a founder and organizer of ISM (Washington Post, March 17, 2003).
The death of an innocent civilian is always tragic, and the best way to avoid such tragedies in the future is, first and foremost, by the Palestinian Authority putting an end to violence, and stopping the smuggling operations that have brought huge quantities of illegal weapons into the Gaza Strip. Activists interested in peace should be protesting the Palestinian actions. Activists also have every right to express their views about Israel’s policies, but they should take care to avoid the appearance of siding with the terrorists or placing themselves in positions where they could be inadvertently caught in the crossfire of a counter-terror operation or otherwise endangered by entering an area where military operations are being conducted.
Gary Fitleberg is a Political Analyst specializing in International Relations with emphasis on Middle East affairs.
Posted by: GARY FITLEBERF at July 18, 2003 4:54 PM
A pretty interesting article, Gary - is it published somewhere? link?
Posted by: Shanti at July 18, 2003 7:50 PM